|
More Uncaged sites:
Contact us:
Uncaged Campaigns,
5th Floor,
Alliance House,
9 Leopold Street,
Sheffield,
S1 2GY, UK
+44 (0) 114 272 2220
info@uncaged.co.uk
| |
news release
UNCAGED DISMISSES PROPOSED GOVERNMENT ANIMAL TESTING CENTRE AS 'MERE
WINDOW DRESSING'
 Leading
anti-vivisection group Uncaged has reacted with disappointment and suspicion
over Government plans for a centre to examine animal testing.
The proposed institute, an extension of an existing Medical Research
Council (MRC) Centre for 'best practice in animal research', appears likely
to focus on the so-called '3R's' approach to animal research: refinement,
reduction and replacement.
Uncaged dismisses the 3Rs approach - developed in 1959 - as outdated
and irrelevant. Campaigns Director Dan Lyons comments:
"There is now a much deeper appreciation of the fundamental
scientific problems with animal experiments, and the mental and physical
suffering endured by caged animals in laboratories. Simply refining
or reducing animal experiments misses the basic problem and will do
virtually nothing to alleviate the pain and distress endured by millions
of animals. The only adequate approach is wholesale replacement of vivisection.
The notion of 'best practice in animal research' is a contradiction
in terms."
Uncaged is also critical of inaccurate media reports portraying the initiative
as "a radical shake-up in the way animal experiments are controlled"
[1]. This DTI project
in fact has no direct relationship with the licensing of vivisection,
which is carried out by a Home Office Inspectorate comprised mainly of
ex-vivisectors. Furthermore, any 'alternative' testing methods developed
by the 3R's centre may have little impact on animal testing because the
Home Office has been unwilling to insist on changes that might impose
short-term financial costs on the vivisection industry.
This proposal is an attempt by the Government to make it appear that
it is listening to growing public disquiet over vivisection without actually
doing anything. In fact, both the Government and the MRC are heavily involved
in pro-vivisection posturing and are unwilling to enter into a serious,
open debate about the acceptability of animal experimentation.
In the meantime, the Home Office continues to rubber-stamp animal research
applications and turn a blind eye to cruel, futile and illegal experimentation.
Without a wholesale, independent review of vivisection and the entire
regulatory structure, this announcement in nothing more than window dressing.
REFERENCES:
- E.g. BBC News "Shake up of animal tests expected"
[ news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3732321.stm
]
Uncaged Campaigns 21.05.04 |
