Click here to make a donation Uncaged Campaigns, campaigning against vivisection

ABOUT US:
about uncaged
latest news
news archive
home

TOPICS:
animal experiments
political animals
xenotransplantation
procter & gamble
iams
pet food info sheet
animal rights
vegan recipes

ACTION:
uncaged action
diary dates
email campaigns
join us

The Compassionate Shopping Guide

International Animal Rights Day

More Uncaged sites:

Protecting Animals in Democracy

Read the secret history of xenotransplantation experiments
Boycott P&G

Contact us:
Uncaged Campaigns,
5th Floor,
Alliance House,
9 Leopold Street,
Sheffield,
S1 2GY, UK
+44 (0) 114 272 2220
info@uncaged.co.uk

 

Click here for the Boycott Herbal Essences website

news release

UNCAGED TACKLE PRO-VIVISECTION MEDIA BIAS

Credit: Organ FarmUncaged today (24 February 2004) have responded once again to a biased and inaccurate editorial in the Daily Telegraph.

We are truly sickened by the refusal of certain sections of the media to cover vivisection issues in balanced way.

Will they publish our response? Don't hold your breath...

Letters to the Editor
Daily Telegraph

24 February 2004

Dear Sir

The opinion piece today (24 February 2004) "Animal wrongs" misrepresents the circumstances surrounding Cambridge University's decision not to press ahead with plans for a primate brain research centre. John Prescott did not overrule the local council - he overruled the independent Planning Inspector's denial of permission following a public inquiry, which had investigated whether the severe vivisection planned for the establishment was scientifically justified and in the national interest. Cambridge University and Prescott were facing a court battle over the perverse decision to overrule the Planning Inspector, and the University had claimed at the Public Inquiry that security fears were not a major issue. Furthermore, the licensing of brain experiments at Cambridge is currently the subject of a judical review following revelations of unpunished law-breaking.

To portray the affair as a battle between 'zealots' and infallible scientists is not only a silly, gross distortion, but it undermines the reasoned public debate which, presumably, the Telegraph would encourage. The wider point is that is not surprising that activists should take the law into their own hands when faced with the abuse of power that the Government and biotechnology industry indulge in. With the Government deliberately failing to enforce even the limited protection offered by the regulatory structure, they are hardly in a position to point an accusing finger at others who disregard the law. Almost three million animals are deliberately subjected to painful and lethal experiments in the UK every year. In comparison to this systematic brutality, any aggressive response from activists is infinitesimal.

Yours sincerely,

Dan Lyons
Director, Uncaged Campaigns

Uncaged Campaigns 24.02.04


 

 

Are you supportive of our mission and methods? Have you found the information on this site useful, enlightening and/or inspiring? Is this website valuable at all? If the answer is 'yes' to any of these questions, then please make a donation to Uncaged Campaigns.

Topˆ